Little progress achieved in G20 fight against tax evasion

A report from Spanish observatory on foreign affairs from the Fundación Alternativas , reveals that measures adopted by the G20 to fight against tax havens and tax evasion have not been implemented yet. The report entitled “The fight against tax havens and tax evasion. Progress since the London G20 summit and the challenges ahead,” proposes ways to put measures that have already been adopted into practice.

The financial crisis in 2008 highlighted the harmful effect of tax havens on the economy of developed and developing countries. It was a key issue at the G20 London Summit in April 2009, where leaders announced a number of important steps to combat tax havens. However, that initial drive has gradually lost momentum.

The measures agreed at the London Summit have proven incomplete, and in subsequent summits G20 leaders have expressed good intentions but have not taken concrete measures. It is hoped that the next summit in Cannes (November 2011) will re-launch important aspects of the fight against harmful tax practices.

On the other hand, during the Spanish and Belgian presidencies of the EU in 2010, some important steps were taken towards greater transparency in the international financial system and in the practices of multinational companies. These measures, if fully implemented, could have a significant impact.

The Fundación Alternativas’s new report aims to provide an account of what has been achieved so far at a various G20 summits and through EU initiatives. It also seeks to build on the important work carried out by the Spanish government in the fight against tax evasion and tax havens, and presents proposals for implementing the measures that have already been adopted. These proposals can be grouped into two areas: those that improve cooperation and the exchange of information between States, and those that improve the transparency of multinational companies (MNCs).

Improve cooperation and the exchange of information between States:

- Encourage a new definition of tax havens by creating a more exhaustive and objective list of non-cooperative jurisdictions than the one already proposed by the OECD

- Launch an initiative aimed at multilateral tax cooperation tosupersede the current method based on fiscal cooperation inbilateral agreements between states (Double taxation Agreements and Treaties of Information Exchange). A system of multilateral sanctions that guarantees their application regardless of the political weight of the country concerned should also be established.

-Support the implementation of an automatic system of tax information exchange, rather than the current on-request OECD model.

- Push forward and broaden the EU Saving Tax Directive (STD) review , which contains an incomplete model of automatic information exchange, and internationalise the revised version beyond the EU.

- Promote the mandatory establishment in all EU member states of a national register of trusts, companies, foundationsand other legal entities created in their territories.

- Create global and European multilateral fiscal bodies to fight against tax evasion, capital flight and tax competition.

Improve the transparency of multinational companies (MNCs):

• The Council should adopt the European Commission proposal on the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB), to combat transfer mispricing and tax evasion.
• MNCs should be required to present their annual accounts on a country-by-country (CBC) basis. This would include disclosing the names and financial performance of all subsidiaries.

There are several ways in which CBC reporting could be addressed.

- companies could self-selected for v oluntary CBC reporting , most notably through the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), or the OECD, which is currently considering incorporating CBC reporting.

- States could also enact legislation aimed at their stock market, such as the Dodd-Frank legislation in the United States. At EU level, it is important to take advantage of the current review of the Transparency Obligations Directive (TOD) inorder to include Recital 14 in the main body of the directive. Doing this would convert the voluntary CBC reporting into a compulsory requirement for extractive industry MNCs that participate in EU capital markets, in harmony with stock market legislation in the United States and Hong Kong .

The international community could also modify the standards set by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). To this end, the report suggests two possible courses of action:

• Ensure that the review process initiated by the IASB to create a new international accounting standard applicable to MNCs in the extractive industry (replacing current IFRS 6) continues to progress and leads to the establishment of a comprehensive CBC reporting standard; or
• Promote the extension of a similar CBC reporting standard to all sectors, before the end of 2011, by means of a review of IFRS 8on operating segments. Segment information provides relevant indicators of business models and the economic reality of a company’s operations a nd is therefore one of the most vital aspects of financial reporting.

Whichever course of action, the report stresses the urgent need for international coordination on taxation, and for a more effective battle against one of the greatest scourges of our time: the dispossession of important resources from states and citizens.