31 January 2011
SEBI Adjudication order in respect of M/s. Helios and Matheson Information Technology Ltd
HMRC designation of the Stock Exchange of Mauritius as a recognised stock exchange for tax purposes
With effect from 31 January 2011, HMRC has designated the Stock Exchange of Mauritius as a 'recognised stock exchange' under section 1005 (1) (b) Income Tax Act 2007.
Securities admitted to trading and listed on the Official Market of the Stock Exchange of Mauritius will meet the HMRC interpretation of ‘listed’ as set out in section 1005 (3) (a) and (3) (b) Income Tax Act 2007.
Please note that securities listed on the Development and Enterprise Market (DEM) of the Stock Exchange of Mauritius will not meet the HMRC definition of ‘listed’.
With effect from 31 January 2011, the Stock Exchange of Mauritius will also be regarded as a recognised stock exchange for Inheritance Tax purposes.
UK: New penalties to tackle offshore tax evasion
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has announced new penalties for offshore non-compliance.
These new penalties come into force from 6 April 2011 and apply to Income Tax and Capital Gains Tax. The first Self Assessment returns affected will be for the 2011-12 tax year, with paper returns due to be filed by 31 October 2012, and electronic returns by 31 January 2013.
The legislation can be found in Schedule 10 of Finance Act 2010.
How it works
The new penalty is an enhancement of the penalties for
- failure to notify
- inaccuracy on a return
- failure to file a return on time
Under the new legislation, these penalties will be linked to the tax transparency of the territory in which the income or gain arises. Where it is harder for HMRC to get information from another country, the penalties for failing to declare income or gains arising in that country will be higher.
There will be three new levels of penalty:
- where the income or gain arises in a territory in 'category 1', the penalty rate will be the same as under existing legislation
- where the income or gain arises in a territory in 'category 2', the penalty rate will be 1.5 times that in existing legislation - up to 150 per cent of tax
- where the income or gain arises in a territory in 'category 3', the penalty rate will be double that in existing legislation - up to 200 per cent of tax
The Treasury has laid legislation before Parliament which describes which territories are in 'category 1' and 'category 3'. All other territories (except the UK) are in 'category 2'.
Category 1 Category 3 Anguilla Albania Aruba Algeria Australia Andorra Belgium Antigua and Barbuda Bulgaria Armenia Canada Bahrain Cayman Islands Barbados Cyprus Belize Czech Republic Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Denmark
(not including Faroe Islands and Greenland)Brazil Estonia Cameroon Finland Cape Verde France Colombia Germany Congo, Republic of the Greece Cook Islands Guernsey Costa Rica Hungary Curaçao Ireland Cuba Isle of Man Democratic People's Republic of Korea Italy Dominica Japan Dominican Republic Korea, South Ecuador Latvia El Salvador Lithuania Gabon Malta Grenada Montserrat Guatemala Netherlands
(not including Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba)Honduras New Zealand
(not including Tokelau)Iran Norway Iraq Poland Jamaica Portugal Kyrgyzstan Romania Lebanon Slovakia Macau Slovenia Marshall Islands Spain Mauritius Sweden Micronesia, Federated States of United States of America
(not including overseas territories and possessions)Monaco Nauru Nicaragua Niue Palau Panama Paraguay Peru Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines San Marino Seychelles Sint Maarten Suriname Syria Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago United Arab Emirates Uruguay
The tax system and the financial crisis
Mauritius: Vice-Prime Minister Jugnauth leads Investment Promotion Mission to UK and France
The Vice-Prime Minister, Minister of Finance and Economic Development, Mr. Pravind Jugnauth, will be in Paris and London from 1 to 4 February to meet potential investors for the promotion of Mauritius as an investment destination.
In Paris, the Vice-Prime Minister will address potential investors and have talks with the management of Bluelink and Air France- KLM. In London, Mr. Jugnauth will present to British businessmen the various investment opportunities in Mauritius in the following sectors: ICT services, specialised health care services, Real Estate development, financial services, transport, agro-industry, aquaculture, seafood industry, the manufacturing sector and the duty free island project.
The Vice-Prime Minister will also hold discussions with Dr Mohan Kaul, CEO of the Commonwealth Business Council and Mr David Frost, Director of the British Chambers of Commerce. The investment promotion campaign is being organised by the Board of Investment (BoI).
During his visit in Paris, Mr. Jugnauth, will also attend the Sixth Global Congress on Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy to be held on 1 and 2 February. The Congress will bring together more than 800 delegates from 80 countries. Participants will consist mainly of government ministers, policy-makers, business leaders, senior law enforcement officials, judges and lawyers, stakeholders from inter-governmental organisations (IGOs) and non-governmental organisations (NGOs), consumer groups and members of academia.
The Congress will serve as a platform for the participants to share proposals for disrupting and curbing the worldwide illicit trade in counterfeit and pirated goods, identify more innovative and effective solutions and build upon successful strategies already in place.
29 January 2011
India's DTAA with Mauritius has gaps, says OECD study
28 January 2011
CDP - Private Equity Investment into Africa: The Cayman and Mauritius Route
The recent invitation by China to South Africa to join the BRIC group of major emerging economies, to create the “BRICS” acronym, has heralded a new dawn, not only for the nation of South Africa, but arguably for the continent of Africa as a whole, with large parts of the African Continent now beginning to see real economic growth and development. Many African countries have taken bold steps to break the cycle of corruption and poverty by moving towards political stability and economic openness. This in turn has brought economic and social advancement as well as an unprecedented receptiveness to foreign direct investment (“FDI”). In addition to this, with increasing global demand for raw materials and commodities, many African countries are seeing renewed attention from the main industrial nations, in a 21st Century “Scramble for Africa”. India and China have been particularly active in Africa as they seek access to the resources essential for their own economic growth and take advantage of the continent’s under penetrated markets and business opportunities.
As well as growth in the mineral and energy sectors, economic expansion in the continent, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, is being supported by a broad base of other sectors including agriculture, technology, telecommunications, media and financial services. These industries are attracting massive FDI, a large chunk of which is coming through private equity investments. Flows of FDI to Africa have been increasing significantly during the last decade and the Cayman Islands and Mauritius both have an important role to play in the investment process.
In a world of economic uncertainty, the jurisdictions of Cayman and Mauritius, each in their own right, provide investors and investment managers with much needed comfort and certainty. When investing into Africa in combination with each other, the jurisdictions provide a stable, well regulated and tax efficient platform which can be relied upon.
This article is available in PDF Format, click below to view:
Private Equity Investment into Africa: The Cayman and Mauritius Route
Guernsey: QROPS Code of Practice
Laws in some countries do not meet global standards
The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax purposes, hosted by the OECD, has released ten reports which evaluate jurisdictions’ commitment to tax transparency and examine whether information is made available and accessible to foreign tax authorities. These reports follow eight others released in September 2010.
“These ten reports continue our work to monitor the compliance of jurisdictions with international standards”, said OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría. “They also underline the importance of the review process the Global Forum has undertaken with the support of the OECD to ensure the advancement of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes.”
The Global Forum has been mandated by the G-20 to assist specific jurisdictions, as well as the international community, to assess the status of national tax legislation, examine whether the laws are enforced, and make recommendations for improvement.
For five jurisdictions the Global Forum is releasing Phase 1 reports which assess the legal and regulatory framework of the jurisdictions. The other five combine Phase 1 and Phase 2 reviews assessing both the legal framework and the practical implementation of the standard.
Phase 1 reviews
Four jurisdictions, Barbados, the Seychelles, San Marino and Trinidad and Tobago fall short of the international standard and will need to implement the recommendations made in their reports before moving to the next phase of their evaluations. It has been noted in the case of San Marino that important legislation has recently been passed (see annex 1 of the report) and will further be examined by the Global Forum.
The report on Guernsey shows that a satisfactory legal framework is in place but that there are minor issues that Guernsey has been asked to address.
Combined reviews
The reports at a glance
Barbados: Some deficiencies have been identified in Barbados bilateral treaties and Barbados has not yet signed new agreements with all jurisdictions wishing to do so. The implementation of recommendations made in the report to address these and other matters will be reviewed in the next 12 months, and only then Barbados will be considered for moving onto the next phase of the evaluation.
Guernsey: The review of Guernsey showed that its legal and regulatory framework is largely in place to ensure effective exchange of information, notably sound access powers and an expanding network of bilateral agreements. Improvements to some accounting rules should nevertheless be made. The evaluation of the practical implementation of this framework will take place in 2012.
San Marino: The peer review has identified some deficiencies in the domestic laws of San Marino, notably including limitations in the authorities’ powers to obtain information mainly on civil tax matters for the purpose of international cooperation. As a result it is not yet ready to move to the next stage of the evaluation. San Marino has in the recent months passed a number of laws with a view to overcome these shortcomings. Its position will therefore be reviewed.
Seychelles: The review of the Seychelles showed deficiencies as regards the availability of ownership and accounting information in respect of offshore entities. In addition, powers to access information should be strengthened. Amendments to its legal and regulatory system are necessary in order for the Seychelles to qualify for the next phase of the evaluation.
Trinidad and Tobago: Trinidad and Tobago is party to a number of bilateral treaties and a multilateral convention. However, it is unable to exchange information to the international standard since not all but one of these agreements has restrictions on access to information by Trinidad and Tobago’s tax authorities. The implementation of the recommendations made in the report will be reviewed in the next 12 months, before Trinidad and Tobago is considered for the next phase of the evaluation.
Australia: Australia is exchanging information to the standard with almost 80 countries. Australia’s legal and institutional framework supports effective access to and provision of information requested by competent authorities of other jurisdictions.
Mauritius: Mauritius has revised its legal and regulatory framework to give its competent authority broad access to most relevant information. However accounting information is not available in all cases and powers to obtain some information are untested. A further analysis will be undertaken in 6 months to assess whether Mauritius exchanges this information effectively and in a timely manner.
Norway: Norway is exchanging information to the standard with more than 100 countries. Norway’s legal and institutional framework supports effective access to and provision of information requested by competent authorities of other jurisdictions.
27 January 2011
Launch of Bedell Cristin (Mauritius) Partnership
OECD: Peer Review Report of Mauritius - Combined Phase 1 + Phase 2 - Executive Summary
- This report summarises the legal and regulatory framework for transparency and exchange of information in Mauritius as well as practical implementation of that framework. The international standard, which is set out in the Global Forum’s Terms of Reference to Monitor and Review Progress Towards Transparency and Exchange of Information, is concerned with the availability of relevant information within a jurisdiction, the competent authority’s ability to gain access to that information, and in turn, whether that information can be effectively and timely exchanged with its exchange of information partners.
- Mauritius is a small and open economy, dynamic, diversified and fully integrated into world markets. Financial services, including providers of services to the offshore sector, are the second pillar of the economy (in GDP). Today Mauritius has developed a legal and regulatory framework that gives its competent authority broad access to the full range of foreseeably relevant information. However, its access powers and enforcement remain to be tested in certain areas.
- In line with the international movement towards more transparency and exchange of information, Mauritius recently has taken significant steps to enhance its exchange of information legal and regulatory framework. Mauritius is now able to exchange information on non-resident individuals and companies. There are accounting requirements for all Mauritius entities, resident and non-resident.
- Mauritius has exchange of information mechanisms in force with 35 jurisdictions, which include most of its main trading partners, and continues negotiating new DTCs and TIEAs. While some of its oldest treaties do not meet the standard, most of them are under renegotiation. The Mauritian authorities also took preventive measures and introduced sanctions against alleged misuse of Mauritius’s treaty network. It is to be noted that Mauritius has never refused to sign an exchange of information agreement.
- As a result of the steps taken, the legal framework for exchange is now largely in place, but also largely untested in practice, particularly concerning ownership and accounting information in the case of some of its offshore companies, since Mauritius did not exchange this type of information until July 2009.
- Exchange of bank information is another area which is untested in practice. The assessment revealed that although bank secrecy does not prevent Mauritius’s authorities from accessing and exchanging information held by banks, its power to obtain information directly from the bank or through court order has remained so far untested. This too has raised concerns with some of Mauritius’s main treaty partners.
- It is recognised that Mauritius is putting in place a national strategy for an efficient exchange of information system, and answers most requests within 90 days. The competent authority (Mauritius Revenue Authority) has created a team of professionals to answer exchange of information requests and is enhancing their professional capacities and methods to cope with difficult cases or complex requests. Mauritius’s competent authority has also signed memorandums of understanding with the public authorities that maintain relevant information. In particular, smooth communication and cooperation between the competent authority and the Financial Services Commission and the court will be key to address the two main issues of exchange of information on some offshore companies and bank information.
- Given that the legal and regulatory framework of Mauritius in some aspects has not yet been tested in practice, and the element A.2 is not in place, the Global Forum will particularly follow-up the capacity of Mauritius to obtain and exchange ownership and accounting information on some of its offshore companies, as well as banking information. Further peer inputs and answers from Mauritius will be sought in 6 months of the adoption of the present report, to assess whether Mauritius exchanges these types of information effectively and in a timely manner.