Most of us accept the idea that to be an accomplished and re-elected politician it is important to be good at rhetoric. Or to be a successful criminal barrister it is necessary to sow just enough doubt in a jury’s collective mind that the prosecution is unable to meet the burden of proof. However, neither of these sets out to be truthful per se being principally designed to deliver an outcome that is favourable for the rhetorician.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment