14 May 2014

FSB-IRTI Mid-Term Review of the Ten-Year Framework and Strategies for Islamic Financial Services Industry Development Assesses the Progress of the Industry and Provides Updated Recommendations

A report "Mid-Term Review of the Ten-Year Framework and Strategies for Islamic Financial Services Industry (IFSI) Development" will be launched on 19 May 2014 during an IFSB-IRTI session to be held in conjunction with the 11th IFSB Summit in Mauritius. The Mid-Term Review report is a joint initiative of the IFSB and Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), the research arm of the Islamic Development Bank Group (IDB).

Previously, in March 2007, the IFSB, IDB and IRTI had jointly developed, in consultation with a wide range of stakeholders, the IFSI Development: Ten-Year Framework and Strategies (Ten-Year Framework). The aim was to provide a general blueprint or guideline that may benefit national authorities in designing and developing their national plans and initiatives as part of their financial sector development policies.

After five years of the initial publication, a Mid-Term Review of the initiative was undertaken with the aim to assess the progress made by the IFSI in implementing the 2007 recommendations, incorporate the new developments taking place in the global financial system and the challenges faced by the IFSI. This would ultimately ensure that the Ten-Year Framework not only continues to remain current, relevant and beneficial but also provide resilience and stability to IFSI in moving forward.

The Mid-Term Review of the Ten-Year Framework has taken into account feedback from regulatory and supervisory authorities as well as market players and select leading industry experts. The feedback was obtained via several platforms organised by the IFSB and IRTI, namely a Roundtable on the Mid-Term Review of the Ten-Year Framework on 6 April 2013 in Doha, Qatar; a Forum on preliminary findings of the mid-term review on 14 May 2013 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; and a High-Level Review Committee Meeting on 17 September 2013 in Istanbul, Turkey. An industry-wide Survey covering the regulators and market players of the IFSI was also conducted in mid-2013.

Benefitting from these comprehensive inputs, the revised Framework comprises four main sections – (a) overall assessments and progress of the priorities and initiatives suggested in the 2007 Ten-Year Framework, (b) sector-level assessments – Islamic banking, Islamic non-bank financial institutions, Takāful and ReTakāful services, and Islamic capital markets – arising from developments in the global financial system post-crisis, (c) updated framework recommendations and key performance indicators for measuring progress, and (d) measures to be undertaken by all stakeholders of the IFSI to implement the 16 recommendations of the Ten-Year Framework, outlined under three categories, namely Enablement, Performance and Reach.

The Mid-Term Review report will be launched on 19 May 2014 during an IFSB-IRTI pre-summit session on Mid-Term Review of the Islamic Financial Services Industry Development: Ten-Year Framework and Strategies. The session will also discuss the proposed measures to address the gaps or challenges in meeting the objectives of the Ten-Year Framework, as well as the roles of the public and private sectors and other stakeholders of the IFSI in carrying out the 16 recommendations.

The Report has been approved by the Council of the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) in its 24th meeting on 27 March 2014.

13 May 2014

Ernst & Young 2014 Worldwide Corporate Tax Guide

Governments worldwide continue to reform their tax codes at a historically rapid rate. Taxpayers need a current guide such as the EY 2014 Worldwide Corporate Tax Guide in such a shifting tax landscape, especially if they are contemplating new markets. 

The content is straightforward. Chapter by chapter, from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, Ernst & Young summarize corporate tax systems in 161 jurisdictions. The content is current on 1 January 2014, with exceptions noted.

12 May 2014

Marc Hein – ‘FSC Mauritius: A great experience in my career as Chairperson during 2 eventful years’

Mr. Marc Hein has announced his decision to resign from his position as Chairperson of the Board of the Financial Services Commission, Mauritius (FSC Mauritius) with effect from the 30th May 2014. He was appointed as Chairperson of FSC Mauritius Board on 19th March 2012.

Mr. Hein explains in his statement that “I have informed the Prime Minister and the Vice Prime Minister and Minister of Finance that I am resigning from the Chair of the FSC on the 30th May 2014. I have been actively involved in public service for almost four years and it is appropriate for me to be allowed to spend more time towards my legal career, to my Chambers and to my family. I also want to spend some meaningful time writing. I wish also to be able to be active in charitable and philanthropic work. For these reasons, I have decided that the time has come for me to take leave from the FSC. It has been a unique opportunity for me to be able to contribute, over the past two years, towards consolidating the position of the Mauritius International Financial Centre as a jurisdiction of substance and sound repute. I am grateful for the opportunity I was given to share my expertise and provide guidance to the Commission during challenging times that the sector had to face. I sincerely thank the Board members, the Chief Executive and all the staff of the FSC for their dedication and invaluable support during my term as Chairperson. I am sure that the FSC will continue on sound foundations and I am very confident in the future of Financial Services in Mauritius.”

Prior to joining FSC Mauritius, Mr. Hein served as Chairperson of the National Economic and Social Council. He started his career as a Barrister in 1980 and is the founder of the Juristconsult Chambers, one of the largest law firms in Mauritius. He specialises in business related laws, including corporate, commercial and banking.

The FSC Chief Executive, Ms Clairette Ah-Hen, states that “Mr. Marc Hein was appointed as Chairperson of the FSC Mauritius Board a few months after I joined the Commission as Chief Executive. It was an enriching experience to work with him and our skills set and experience complemented each other. His guidance has been meaningful and the FSC has, over the past two years, achieved a lot in spite of the challenging times that the sector had to face. On behalf of the staff of the Commission and on my own behalf, I wish him well in his future endeavours.”

Financial Services Commission, Mauritius
12 May 2014

GFI: African Countries Lose Billions through Misinvoiced Trade

The fraudulent misinvoicing of trade is hampering economic growth and potentially resulting in billions of U.S. dollars in lost tax revenue in Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Uganda, according to a new report to be published Monday by Global Financial Integrity (GFI), a Washington DC-based research and advocacy organization. The study—funded by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark—finds that the over- and under-invoicing of trade transactions facilitated at least US$60.8 billion in illicit financial flows into or out of the five African countries between 2002 and 2011.

“It is deeply disconcerting that illicit financial flows are taking such a serious toll on the economies of Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Uganda,” noted Mogens Jensen, Danish Minister for Trade and Development Cooperation. “Denmark has for several years supported Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Uganda in fighting poverty and promoting economic growth and job creation. These efforts are clearly at risk of being undermined by fraudulent trade transactions which rob the people of these countries of funds that could otherwise have been used for investments in infrastructure, schools, hospitals, and other much needed public services. I hope that the study can help the governments in their efforts to curb illicit financial flows.”

“Trade misinvoicing is stymieing economic growth and likely decimating government revenues in these countries,” said GFI President Raymond Baker, a longtime authority on financial crime. “The consequences are simply devastating.  The capital drained from trade misinvoicing means that local businesses in Uganda and Tanzania have less money to grow their companies and hire more workers.  The potential revenue loss from trade misinvoicing means that Ghana has less money to spend on healthcare, Kenya has less money to devote to education, and Mozambique has less money to invest in infrastructure.  Trade misinvoicing is perhaps the most serious economic issue plaguing these countries.”

Titled “Hiding in Plain Sight: Trade Misinvoicing and the Impact of Revenue Loss in Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Uganda: 2002-2011,” the study estimates that, collectively, trade misinvoicing may have cost the taxpayers of these five African nations US$14.39 billion in lost revenue over the decade. The potential average annual tax loss from trade misinvoicing amounted to roughly 12.7% of Uganda’s total government revenue over the years 2002-2011, followed by Ghana (11.0%), Mozambique (10.4%), Kenya (8.3%), and Tanzania (7.4%).1

Authored by a team of GFI experts, the analysis reviews the components and drivers of trade misinvoicing in Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Uganda, it estimates the potential impact on tax revenue for each government, it analyzes the policy environment in each country, and it provides general policy recommendations as well as specific suggestions tailored to the circumstances in each nation.

Policy Recommendations

Based around two themes—greater transparency in domestic and international financial transactions, and greater cooperation between developed and developing country governments to shut down the channels through which illicit money flows—the report recommends a number of steps that can be taken by these five countries to ameliorate the problem of illicit flows of money into and out of the country. Among other steps, GFI recommends that:
  • Governments should significantly boost their customs enforcement, by equipping and training officers to better detect intentional misinvoicing of trade transactions;
  • Trade transactions involving tax haven jurisdictions should be treated with the highest level of scrutiny by customs, tax, and law enforcement officials;
  • Government authorities should create central, public registries of meaningful beneficial ownership information for all companies formed in their country to combat the abuse of anonymous shell companies;
  • Financial regulators should require that all banks in their country know the true beneficial owner of any account opened in their financial institution;
  • Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Uganda should actively participate in the worldwide movement towards the automatic exchange of tax information as endorsed by the G20 and the OECD;
  • Kenya and Uganda should follow the lead of Ghana, Mozambique, and Tanzania in joining and complying with the Extractives Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI); and
  • Government authorities should adopt and fully implement all of the Financial Action Task Force’s anti-money laundering recommendations.

“It is our view that this is just the beginning of the conversation surrounding trade misinvoicing and illicit flows in these countries,” added Mr. Baker, GFI’s president. “Our analysis makes it clear that more research can and should be done to further identify areas for improvement.  It’s our desire to work constructively with the governments of Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Uganda to meaningfully curtail the scourge of illicit financial flows.”

Methodology

GFI Chief Economist Dev Kar and GFI Junior Economist Brian LeBlanc developed robust economic models that highlight the drivers and dynamics of illicit flows in both directions for each of the five countries analyzed. Nevertheless, GFI cautioned that their methodology is very conservative and that there are likely to be more illicit flows into and out of these countries that are not captured by the models.

“The estimates provided by our methodology are likely to be extremely conservative as they do not include trade misinvoicing in services or intangibles, same-invoice trade misinvoicing, hawala transactions, and dealings conducted in bulk cash,” explained Mr. Baker.

Key Findings of the Report

Ghana

Over the decade:

  • US$7.32 billion flowed illegally out of the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • US$7.07 billion flowed illegally into the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • US$14.39 billion in illicit capital flowed either into or out of the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • Gross illicit flows were pegged at 6.6% of the country’s GDP;
  • Gross illicit flows roughly equaled ODA provided to the nation;
  • The under-invoicing of exports amounted to US$5.1 billion;
  • The under-invoicing of exports was the primary method for shifting money illicitly out of the country;
  • The under-invoicing of imports amounted to US$4.6 billion;
  • The under-invoicing of imports was the primary method for illegally smuggling capital into the country;
  • Tax revenue loss from trade misinvoicing potentially totaled US$3.86 billion, averaged US$386 million per year;
  • Tax revenue loss from trade misinvoicing roughly equaled 11.0% of total government revenue.

Kenya

From 2002-2010:

  • US$9.64 billion flowed illegally out of the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • US$3.94 billion flowed illegally into the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • US$13.58 billion in illicit capital flowed either into or out of the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • Gross illicit flows were pegged at 7.8% of the country’s GDP;
  • Gross illicit flows were twice the ODA provided to the nation;
  • The under-invoicing of exports amounted to US$9.26 billion;
  • The under-invoicing of exports was the primary method for shifting money illicitly out of the country;
  • The under-invoicing of imports amounted to US$3.94 billion;
  • The under-invoicing of imports was the only method for illegally smuggling capital into the country;
  • Tax revenue loss from trade misinvoicing potentially totaled US$3.92 billion, averaged US$435 million per year;
  • Tax revenue loss from trade misinvoicing roughly equaled 8.3% of total government revenue.

Mozambique

From 2002-2010:

  • US$2.33 billion flowed illegally out of the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • US$2.93 billion flowed illegally into the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • US$5.27 billion in illicit capital flowed either into or out of the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • Gross illicit flows were pegged at 9.0% of the country’s GDP;
  • Gross illicit flows amounted to 32.6% of ODA provided to the nation;
  • Export under-invoicing amounted to US$1.26 billion;
  • Import over-invoicing amounted to US$1.08 billion;
  • Both export under-invoicing and import over-invoicing were common for shifting money illicitly out of the country;
  • Import under-invoicing amounted to US$2.22 billion;
  • Import under-invoicing was the primary method for illegally smuggling capital into the country;
  • Tax revenue loss from trade misinvoicing potentially totaled US$1.68 billion, averaged US$187 million per year; 
  • Tax revenue loss from trade misinvoicing roughly equaled 10.4% of total government revenue.

Tanzania

Over the decade:

  • US$8.28 billion flowed illegally out of the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • US$10.44 billion flowed illegally into the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • US$18.73 billion in illicit capital flowed either into or out of the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • Gross illicit flows were pegged at 9.4% of the country’s GDP;
  • Gross illicit flows amounted to 77.6% of ODA provided to the nation;
  • Import over-invoicing amounted to US$8.28 billion;
  • Import over-invoicing was the only method for shifting money illicitly out of the country;
  • Export over-invoicing amounted to US$10.34 billion;
  • Export over-invoicing was the primary method for illegally smuggling capital into the country;
  • Tax revenue loss from trade misinvoicing potentially totaled US$2.48 billion, averaged US$248 million per year; 
  • Tax revenue loss from trade misinvoicing roughly equaled 7.4% of total government revenue.

Uganda

Over the decade:

  • US$8.39 billion flowed illegally out of the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • US$457 million flowed illegally into the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • US$8.84 billion in illicit capital flowed either into or out of the country due to trade misinvoicing;
  • Gross illicit flows were pegged at 7.1% of the country’s GDP;
  • Gross illicit flows amounted to 58.9% of ODA provided to the nation;
  • Import over-invoicing amounted to US$8.13 billion;
  • Import over-invoicing was the primary method for shifting money illicitly out of the country;
  • Export over-invoicing amounted to US$457 million;
  • Export over-invoicing was the only method for illegally smuggling capital into the country;
  • Tax revenue loss from trade misinvoicing potentially totaled US$2.43 billion, averaged US$243 million per year;
  • Tax revenue loss from trade misinvoicing roughly equaled 12.7% of total government revenue.

09 May 2014

IMF Policy Paper: Spillovers in International Corporate Taxation

This paper explores the nature, significance and policy implications of spillovers in international corporate taxation—the effects of one country’s rules and practices on others. It complements current initiatives focused on tax avoidance by multinationals, notably the G20-OECD project on Base Erosion and Profit shifting (BEPS). The paper draws on the IMF’s experience on international tax issues with its wide membership, including through technical assistance (TA), and on its previous analytical work, to analyze spillovers and how they might be addressed. In doing so, it goes beyond current initiatives to look at a wide set of possible responses.

Offshore Investment (May 2014) : The new Hong Kong Trust Law - 70 years on

New legislation in respect of trusts in Hong Kong came into force in December. Prior to the amendments, the Trustee Ordinance was essentially a re-enactment of the 1925 English Trustee Act 1925, introduced into Hong Kong in 1934 and therefore an overhaul of the law was well overdue. Pearl Lam explains how the reforms are in line with changes in the law both in England and Singapore and therefore enhance Hong Kong’s competitive edge.

These include a review of the trustees’ duty of care and exemption clauses, and a reform of key trustee powers, including their power to insure, power as to self-remuneration, power to appoint agents and powers in respect of authorised investments. In respect of settlors, new provisions allow increased ability to reserve powers of investment and asset management and protection against forced heirship claims.

Hong Kong has firmly brought itself into competition with other comparable jurisdictions with these amendments to the Trustee Ordinance. With the modernisation, and the absence of licensing requirements, it becomes an attractive jurisdiction for professional trustees to set up trust companies and will no doubt attract more trust business for sophisticated succession planning purposes, particularly in Asia where dynastic trusts are popular.

Offshore Investment (May 2014): No more QE!

Most of us accept the idea that to be an accomplished and re-elected politician it is important to be good at rhetoric.  Or to be a successful criminal barrister it is necessary to sow just enough doubt in a jury’s collective mind that the prosecution is unable to meet the burden of proof.  However, neither of these sets out to be truthful per se being principally designed to deliver an outcome that is favourable for the rhetorician. 

08 May 2014

IMF - Mauritius: 2014 Article IV Consultation-Staff Report, Press Release, and Statement

The Mauritian economy has grown steadily despite weak activity in Europe, its main trading partner. Growth was supported by fiscal stimulus and accommodative monetary policy. The economy is operating slightly below potential, domestic investment has fallen, and the planned medium-term fiscal consolidation has been delayed. Outlook and risks: The economic outlook for 2014 is broadly positive with growth projected at 3¾ percent and inflation at 4½ percent. The main short-term risk would be renewed Euro area financial stress; medium-term risks relate to weak future reform efforts. Fiscal policy: The 2014 fiscal stance is neutral. Staff recommended initiating fiscal adjustment already in 2014 to smooth the planned medium-term adjustment. Staff projects debt to be sustainable, but recommended additional medium-term fiscal adjustment efforts to safely reach the legally-mandated 2018 debt target. Monetary policy: The moderately accommodative monetary policy is appropriate but should be forward looking to anticipate inflationary pressures. Excess liquidity has to be removed to improve the monetary transmission mechanism despite likely, but justified, losses for the Bank of Mauritius. Staff suggested sharing the cost of monetary policy. External sustainability: Standard quantitative measures together with a persistently high current account deficit, weak export performance, and wage growth in excess of productivity suggest a moderate overvaluation. International reserves appear adequate. Long-term growth: Staff suggested fiscal adjustment and structural reforms to reduce external vulnerabilities and improve long-term growth. Reforms to public enterprises, social safety nets, pensions, local governments, and the general business environment could lift longer-term growth rates to reach high income status faster than projected. Financial sector: The financial sector remains well-capitalized and profitable. Stress tests show a broad resilience of the system. BOM started using macro-prudential tools and is improving coordination with the nonbank supervisor.

07 May 2014

Hong Kong: SFC outlines risks of crowd-funding and potential regulatory issues

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) today issues a notice reminding parties engaging in crowd-funding activities of the potential application of relevant securities laws and regulations, and reminding the public of potential risks relating to participating in crowd-funding activities in view of the increase in such activities internationally and in Hong Kong.

Parties engaging in crowd-funding activities are reminded that this may be subject to provisions of the Securities and Futures Ordinance, the Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance and/or relevant SFC requirements, including regulations on offers of investments, intermediary licensing and conduct of business requirements, and requirements applicable to automated trading services and/or recognized exchange companies. Other Hong Kong laws and regulations may also apply depending on the features of the activities. Parties looking to engage in crowd-funding activities should seek professional advice if in doubt to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.

Potential risks involved in participating in crowd-funding activities as an investor include risk of default, risk of illiquidity of the investment, risk of platform failure and insolvency, risk of fraud, risks associated with platforms operating outside Hong Kong, information asymmetry and lack of transparency, cyber security issues and possible illegal activities. Investors considering participating in crowd-funding activities and in doubt about the nature, risk profile and regulatory status of such activities should seek professional advice.

“Parties seeking to engage in crowd-funding activities should be aware that a breach of the relevant laws could lead to serious consequences including criminal liability,” said Mr Ashley Alder, the SFC’s Chief Executive Officer. “Investors should also take note that participating in crowd-funding activities could involve significant risks.” 

“The SFC will keep in view the development of crowd-funding activities and will take appropriate regulatory action where non-compliance with relevant securities laws and regulations is detected,” Mr Alder added.

06 May 2014

OECD - Countries commit to automatic exchange of information in tax matters

Bank secrecy for tax purposes is coming to an end as countries and major financial centres commit to automatic exchange of information between jurisdictions.

The Declaration on Automatic Exchange of Information in Tax Matters was endorsed during the OECD’s annual Ministerial Council Meeting in Paris by all 34 member countries, along with Argentina, Brazil, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, India, Indonesia, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore and South Africa.

The Declaration commits countries to implement a new single global standard on automatic exchange of information. The standard, which was developed at the OECD and endorsed by G20 finance ministers last February, obliges countries and jurisdictions to obtain all financial information from their financial institutions and exchange that information automatically with other jurisdictions on an annual basis.

“Tax fraud and tax evasion are not victimless crimes: they deprive governments of revenues needed to restore growth and jeopardise citizens’ trust in the fairness and integrity of the tax system,” OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría said. “Today’s commitment by so many countries  to implement the new global standard, and to do so quickly, is another major step towards ensuring that tax cheats have nowhere left to hide.”

The OECD will deliver a detailed Commentary on the new standard, as well as technical solutions to implement the actual information exchanges, during a meeting of G20 finance ministers in September 2014. 
G20 governments have mandated the OECD-hosted Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes to monitor and review implementation of the standard. 
   
More than 60 countries and jurisdictions have now committed to early adoption of the standard, and additional Global Forum members are expected to join this group in the coming months.

02 May 2014

OXFAM - Developing countries must be at the heart of Global Tax Reform

After the world was plunged into a financial crisis, back in 2009, G20 leaders promised to clean up the international tax system, once and for all. The result – five years on – is a plan of action devised for them by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to tackle Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS), a series of tactics used by multinational companies to make profits ‘disappear’ or move to another country, to pay less or even avoid paying corporate taxation. 

This action plan is obviously a much needed and welcome step. The current dysfunctional international tax rules are allowing scores of multinational companies to pay minimal tax bills in the countries where economic production takes place, compared to the profits they are earning and often hiding offshore. They also fuel a system of unhealthy competition abused by companies, where developing countries enter into a race to the bottom to offer the most competitive tax rates and unfeasible tax breaks, in the hope of attracting foreign investment to their shores. And they exacerbate inequality, because it’s the least well-off economies who are being hit hardest. 

It’s estimated that the tax gap, in other words the amount of tax liability not paid by multinationals to developing countries, is about $104 billion a year. One discreet example of corporate tax dodging illustrates the kind of impact this has for the public; Peru’s tax administration audited just a fraction of corporate transactions involving transfer pricing in 2013, and uncovered a sum equivalent to US$ 105 million in unpaid tax - almost enough to fund the whole maternal neonatal public programme. 

So why, when developing countries are so obviously impacted and when better tax structures could be of such monumental benefit to poorer economies, are these nations not being involved in any plans for tax reform? The OECD’s negotiations have failed so far to include any developing countries in the process on an equal footing. There have been attempts to ‘consult’ some of them but on such a serious issue as an international tax reform, more than mere consultation is needed.  

Currently the reform led by the OECD leaves four fifths of the planet on the side and is posing a huge risk that any revisions to global tax rules will only reflect the interests of the wealthiest and most powerful nations.

Oxfam believes that any global talks to reform tax rules must include all countries, including the poorest. Policy makers and influencials representing the G20 and other OECD members must use the opportunity of the OECD Forum, taking place in Paris next week, to commit to doing this. 

If done properly, the G20/OECD BEPS project presents a unique opportunity to overhaul international corporate tax rules to the benefit of all economies, an opportunity too rare and important to be squandered. 

But beyond that, we need to raise our ambition on tax reform. Global governments should start seriously talking about the creation of a World Tax Authority with the mission to ensure that tax systems will deliver for the public interests in all countries.

OXFAM - Business Among Friends: Why corporate tax dodgers are not yet losing sleep over global tax reform

Fair tax regimes are vital to finance well-functioning states and to enable governments to uphold citizens’ rights to basic services, such as healthcare and education. Tax dodging by big corporations deprives governments of billions of dollars and drives rapidly increasing inequality. Recent G20 and OECD moves to clamp down on corporate tax dodging are a welcome first step, but opponents are set on undermining them. And most developing countries, which lose billions to corporate tax dodging annually, are being left out of the decision making.

Oxfam’s briefing shows how tax rules are rigged in favour of multinational corporations and how the G20’s current approach to tax reform is at risk of being dominated by a legion of corporate lobbyists. Commercial interests must not be allowed to pursue their agenda at the cost of the public interest. All developing countries must be included in negotiations, and corporations must pay what they owe.

01 May 2014

IFC Review: The Seychelles Vision

Rupert Simeon examines the great strides the Seychelles is making to comply with international transparency standards.

IFC Review: FATCA Offspring

With FATCA proving to be a watershed moment for information exchange, Louise Gonçalves and Eran Shay discuss what this means for those caught within its grasp.


IFC Review: An Asian Welcome for Offshore

Frances Woo examines how Asian financial centres have gone from strength to strength in recent years through facilitating global trade and investment. 

IFC Review - Revised Parent and Subsidiary Directive: Towards a Fairer Tax System

Thomas Neale highlights European Commision initiatives to lift tax obstacles to trade while also striving for a fairer tax system by regulating against tax avoidance.

IFC Review - Due Diligence: NGO’s and Charities

In this month's column, Burke Files examines how the veneer of decency can be used to hide mischief through the use of Charities and NGO's as channels for laundering money.

IFC Review - Protection Ratchets Up: Long Finance and Offshore Centres

Professor Michael Mainelli examines the potential for IFCs to market themselves as leaders in the fight for tax transparency as they have often been shown to be ahead of the regulatory curve when compared to their onshore rivals.

29 April 2014

Guernsey responds to UK PM's letter on beneficial ownership

The Chief Minister of Guernsey and the Chief Executive of Guernsey Finance - the promotional agency for the Island's finance industry - have both responded to a letter from UK Prime Minister David Cameron regarding beneficial ownership.

Last week Mr Cameron wrote an open letter to all Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories exhorting them to join the UK in establishing a publicly available central register on beneficial ownership.

Fiona Le Poidevin, Chief Executive of Guernsey Finance, said: "We welcome the Prime Minister's recognition of our continued commitment to working with the UK to promote the application of high international standards.

"Indeed, it should be noted that in 1989 Guernsey became one of the first jurisdictions to regulate trust and company service providers and this is something which still does not happen in many territories around the world today, including the UK. In addition, Guernsey has had legislation in place since 2000 that obliges all beneficial owners of Guernsey companies and other legal persons to be properly identified and recorded by regulated corporate service providers and is one of only a handful of jurisdictions that have such measures in place. However, Guernsey has always maintained client confidentiality and this information is not shared publicly.

"Guernsey is ahead of the curve and we look forward to other jurisdictions stepping up to the mark so that we can help create a level playing field on beneficial ownership. Whether that will include a truly public register remains to be seen given the significant implications, for example in respect of data privacy and human rights as well as the potential negative impact on inward investment for any jurisdictions which adopt measures that are not global in reach."

In September last year the Prime Minister told the House of Commons that it would be unfair to refer to the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories as "tax havens".

In October Guernsey and the other Crown Dependencies of Jersey and the Isle of Man signed an agreement with the UK on a package of tax measures. It enhanced the automatic tax information exchange provisions already in place between Guernsey and the UK under measures equivalent to the EU Savings Tax Directive.

In last week's letter, the Prime Minister said that he "welcomed [Guernsey's] continued commitments to work with the UK to promote the application of high international standards. Our joint approach has been our strength and I hope we can continue to push this agenda forward together."

He added: "I believe that beneficial ownership and public access to a central register is a key to improving the transparency of company ownership and vital to meeting the urgent challenges of illicit finance and tax evasions."

Guernsey's Chief Minister, Jonathan Le Tocq, said: "The UK Prime Minister's letter of 22 April 2014 accompanies the UK Government's response to the consultation it launched last autumn on beneficial ownership. With regard to the letter, I am pleased that it again acknowledges Guernsey's commitment to the promotion and application of high international standards.

"We are looking at the detail of the UK Government paper in order to see how it might inform thinking on our existing regulatory framework for corporate service providers, and on how we continue to progress our action plan on beneficial ownership, which was published in June 2013.

"Guernsey continues to be supportive of any steps to create a truly global level playing field on transparency issues. I will be responding to the Prime Minister's letter in due course."

Transparency on beneficial ownership

The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, David Cameron, has written to all the Crown Dependencies and the Overseas Territories following the publication last week of the UK Government’s report on its proposals to enhance the transparency of UK company ownership. 

In his letter to the Chief Minster, Mr Cameron welcomed the Crown Dependencies’ decisions to join the United Kingdom in leading work to raise standards of transparency globally. He said: “I appreciate that Jersey already has a central registry of company beneficial ownership in place and I welcome your publication of a consultation on its effectiveness.”

The Chief Minister, Senator Ian Gorst, commented: “I welcome the Prime Minister’s recognition of our long-established leading approach to transparency on beneficial ownership, which has also been recognised by the World Bank and others. However, what could also be added is our comprehensive licensing and regulation of trust and company service providers, which are not included in the United Kingdom Government’s proposals. We consider such provisions to be essential for law enforcement and for tax authorities to obtain, as they can from us, accurate, adequate and up-to-date information on beneficial ownership to help combat tax evasion, money laundering and corruption.

“Once we know the outcome of our consultation, we will be in a position to respond to the Prime Minister’s letter. In doing so, we will be considering how the approaches adopted by the UK Government and other G8/G20 members to enhancing transparency on beneficial ownership compare with what  is able to be achieved with our own approach.”

25 April 2014

McAfee Labs White Paper - Jackpot! Money Laundering Through Online Gambling

In Martin Scorsese’s 1995 film, “Casino,” Robert DeNiro’s character is charged with operating a 1970’s Las Vegas casino for the Chicago mafia. He and his partner in crime (played by Joe Pesci), shake down the strip, skimming millions in casino earnings. The story ends in disaster for the pair—but the film’s plot underlines an important point: the ability to move massive amounts of money through a legitimate business, like a casino, is an effective means to disguise criminal activity.

This fact isn’t lost on today’s hackers and cybercriminals, especially when they need to make profits from the online sale of drugs, weapons, or other black market items appear clean, quickly. Our most recent report, “Jackpot! Money Laundering Through Online Gambling,” discusses this subject at length—looking at the why and how behind cybercriminals’ use of online gambling to launder money made from illegal activities.

Among the report’s primary findings: cybercriminals and hackers are turning to online casinos—an industry set to grow nearly 30% over the next three years—for money laundering. This may sound like something straight out of the movies, but it’s happening everyday. In fact, according to Dr. Ingo Fiedler, a leading researcher of online gambling, roughly $1.6 billion in criminal profits enter the mainstream economy through money laundering every year. And much of this can be linked to the emergence of virtual casinos, which provide crooks with the means to quickly and efficiently “launder” their money.

24 April 2014

OECD: International community continues making progress on tax transparency

The international community continues making progress toward greater cooperation to ensure effective information exchange in tax matters. The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes issued today 12 new reports that highlight action being taken by jurisdictions to implement the international standard for exchange of information on request.  

Four Phase 1 reports were published assessing jurisdictions’ legal and regulatory framework for transparency and exchange of information. Colombia, Latvia, and Saudi Arabia qualify for the next stage of the review process, while the peer review of The Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) determined that the jurisdiction does not have in place a legal framework for transparency, and therefore does not qualify for a Phase 2 review.

The review of FSM was conducted under the special procedure for non-members, which ensures that jurisdictions do not gain a competitive advantage by refusing to implement the international standard or participate in the Global Forum. The FSM was identified in 2012 as a relevant jurisdiction for the Global Forum’s work, due to development of a captive insurance industry.

The Global Forum published Phase 2 reports - which review exchange of information practices - in four jurisdictions and allocated ratings for compliance with the individual elements of the international standard as well as an overall rating. Barbados received an overall rating of “Partially Compliant,” due, in part, to gaps in its network of agreements to exchange information, Malaysia and the Slovak Republic received an overall rating of “Largely Compliant” and Slovenia was rated Compliant. 

Four supplementary peer review reports were also published, assessing progress made by jurisdictions to address gaps identified in their legal frameworks and exchange of information practices since their previous reviews.

After substantial changes to implement Global Forum recommendations, Botswana and the United Arab Emirates are no longer blocked from moving to the next Phase of the peer review process. Mauritius is also shown to have implemented recommendations made by the Global Forum, and maintains an overall “Largely Compliant” rating.

The supplementary report on Panama points to several improvements in its legal framework, but concludes that further progress is necessary in a number of areas before it is able to qualify for a Phase 2 review.

As legal and practical improvements are being made in many other jurisdictions, more supplementary reviews are expected to be pursued this year. To date, the Global Forum has completed 132 peer reviews and assigned compliance ratings to 54 jurisdictions that have undergone Phase 2 reviews. Four jurisdictions remain non-compliant, three are now partially compliant and there are 13 jurisdictions which are blocked from moving to a Phase 2 review.

The Global Forum is currently revising its Terms of Reference for assessing jurisdictions in advance of a new round of reviews starting in 2016, with regard to the international standard of exchange of information on request. The Global Forum has also begun work on the implementation of the new standard for automatic exchange of information (AEOI) i.e. the Common Reporting Standard, which was released by the OECD in February 2014. G20 Finance Ministers endorsed the CRS during a ministerial meeting in Sydney, Australia, committed to implementation and called on all financial centres to match their commitments.

The first meeting of the Global Forum’s new AEOI group – currently comprising 54 jurisdictions – took place in Paris on 27-28 March. Delegates focussed on development of a monitoring and review mechanism for the new AEOI standard and on its global implementation, in particular, how to enable developing countries to participate in automatic exchange.

Transparency and trust: enhancing transparency of UK company ownership and increasing trust in UK business

Outlines how government plans to proceed with the following policies:
  • establish a publicly accessible central registry of UK company beneficial ownership information
  • improve transparency of company ownership and control, including:
  • abolishing bearer shares
  • prohibiting the use of corporate directors (with exceptions)
  • increasing the accountability of those who control company directors
  • improve trust in the UK regime for disqualifying company directors
  • increase the likelihood of creditors being compensated where they have suffered loss from director misconduct


IMF Executive Board Concludes 2014 Article IV Consultation with Mauritius

On April, 21, 2014, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation with Mauritius.

A stable macroeconomic environment was maintained in 2013, despite difficult external developments. Real GDP growth was lower than expected at 3.2 percent in 2013, mainly on account of construction, sugar and tourism. With subdued international prices, inflationary pressures declined in 2013, despite the public sector wage increases, and year-on-year inflation fell to 3.5 percent. The unemployment rate was unchanged compared to 2012 at 8.0 percent. Credit to private sector growth remained robust. On the external front, the current account deficit widened to almost 10 percent of GDP in 2013. The reserve cover of imports of goods and services stayed constant at 4½ months with the Bank of Mauritius (BOM) accumulating additional net international reserves.

The fiscal policy stance was more expansionary than planned because of cyclical and one-off factors but also slippages. The structural primary deficit was broadly unchanged relative to 2011. The overall deficit including extra-budgetary funds is estimated at 4½ percent of GDP. While revenues remained broadly unchanged in proportion of GDP, expenditures increased by over 2 percent of GDP. As expected wages increased following the Pay Research Bureau’s (PRB) report, which increases civil servant salaries beyond annual inflation adjustments periodically with the next adjustment expected in 2016. Additional spending was also related to the flash floods in Port Louis as well as unplanned transfers to local governments and public enterprises. Finally, capital spending including by the special funds was 1 percent of GDP higher, though partially due to cost overruns.

Monetary policy was somewhat accommodative. Throughout the year, while a sluggish domestic demand and low international inflationary pressures helped anchor inflation expectations. The public sector wage increase related to the PRB report did not lead to strong private sector wage pressures. In this context, the BOM maintained the policy rate at 4.65 percent in September 2013 and February 2014, following a 25 basis point reduction in June 2013. In October 2013, reserve requirements were raised from 7 to 8 percent to curb excess liquidity in the banking system. The authorities continued building international reserves and used limited interventions to moderate excessive fluctuations of the rupee. The banking system remained well-capitalized and resilient in a strong regulatory context. Regulatory Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets are well above Basel II and the proposed Basel III requirements. Non-performing loans (NPL) increased slightly in 2013, but banks remained profitable with a 20 percent return on equity, despite low leverage ratios. However, liquidity ratios have worsened in recent years and are on the low side in international comparisons. BOM is consulting with banks on implementation of Basel III regulations and continued to publish its bi-annual CAMEL ratings for all domestic banks. It implemented macroprudential measures aimed at addressing emerging NPLs in the construction and real estate sectors as well as rising indebtedness. Threats to financial stability posed by a Ponzi-like scheme in 2013 were contained successfully, and the regulatory framework was subsequently improved.

Mauritius has established a track record as a reformer with strong institutions and a dynamic private sector. The Africa Training Institute (ATI) is set to open in June 2014 in Ebene. The country statistical capacity continues to be strengthened, including ongoing work on Monetary and Financial Statistics (MFS) as well as balance of payments (BOP) and international investment position (IIP) statistics. Mauritius subscribed to the IMF’s Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) in February 2012, being the second Sub-Saharan African country to do so and is working on subscribing to SDDS Plus.

Executive Board Assessment

Executive Directors agreed with the thrust of the staff appraisal. They noted that Mauritius’ prudent policies and strong institutions have delivered steady growth, well-anchored inflation expectations, and continued financial stability. The near-term growth outlook is generally favorable, but an uncertain external environment carries risks. Against this background, Directors encouraged the authorities to consolidate recent macroeconomic gains, strengthen policy buffers, and pursue greater economic diversification through structural reforms to enhance the resilience of the economy.

Directors generally considered it appropriate to start tightening fiscal policy this year to smooth adjustment and increase the likelihood that the 50 percent target for the debt-to-GDP ratio is achieved by 2018, as mandated by law. They encouraged the authorities to articulate an ambitious consolidation strategy centered on better prioritizing public expenditure, strengthening tax administration, and broadening the tax base. Subsidy reforms and an overhaul of public enterprises, as well as an improved framework for fiscal devolution, including a better use of real estate taxes, could also underpin the budgetary adjustment over the medium term.

Directors agreed that the current monetary stance is broadly appropriate, but cautioned that a withdrawal of accommodation might be necessary if inflationary pressures intensify. They also suggested strengthening the institutional and operational arrangements that would support the eventual adoption of a formal inflation targeting framework.

Directors noted that the banking system remains well-capitalized, profitable, and resilient to shocks. They observed, however, that persistent excess liquidity in the banking system has hindered the monetary transmission mechanism, while also encouraging disintermediation and riskier lending. To address this issue, Directors encouraged the authorities to consider an approach to liquidity management involving additional issuance of government paper for monetary policy purposes and—more broadly—closer collaboration between the government and the central bank. Similarly, coordination between the central bank and the nonbank supervisor should continue to be strengthened to ensure the soundness of the overall financial system.

Directors took note of the staff’s assessment that the rupee appears to be modestly overvalued in real effective terms. To bolster Mauritius’s international competitiveness and durably reduce the large structural current account deficit, they recommended greater exchange rate flexibility, well-prioritized infrastructure investment, and stepped-up reforms to address labor and product markets rigidities. Directors also agreed that the external adjustment could benefit from further pension reforms that would boost national savings while strengthening social protection.

Directors welcomed the authorities’ intention to adopt the Fund’s SDDS Plus, and supported ongoing efforts to improve the collection of financial and labor market statistics.

22 April 2014

FSC Mauritius Survey and FAQs on Credit Rating Agencies

The Financial Services Commission (“FSC Mauritius”) is developing a regulatory regime for credit rating agencies (“CRAs”), one of the factors which support the development of the corporate bond market.

Questionnaire

The FSC Mauritius is issuing three questionnaires for bond issuers, investors and credit rating agencies respectively to gather data which will assist the FSC Mauritius in developing the regulatory regime for CRAs. It is inviting the responses to the questionnaires to be emailed to crasurvey@fscmauritius.org by 30 May 2014.

FAQs

The FSC Mauritius is also issuing a list of Frequently Asked Questions to inform the public about CRAs and the IOSCO Objectives and Principles governing the regulation of the activities of CRAs.

Financial Services Commission
22 April 2014

18 April 2014

Mauritius: FSC Annual Renewal Licence Fees 2014 – 2015 for Management Companies

All licensees holding a Management Company Licence (FS-3.1A) are required to fill in and submit the Remittance Advice for the payment of their Annual Renewal Licence Fee 2014-2015. The Remittance Advice has to be filled in electronically, printed, signed and submitted along with the payment.

17 April 2014

UK: HMRC update to its offshore evasion strategy 'No safe havens'

HMRC published an update to its offshore evasion strategy 'No safe havens' on 14 April 2014. This strategy sets out a coherent and coordinated framework for HMRC's approach to tackling offshore evasion.

APEC: Release of the Asia Region Funds Passport consultation paper

On 16 April 2014, the governments of the passport working group (Australia, Korea, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand) released a consultation paper to seek views from the public on the details of the proposed arrangements. This follows the signing of a statement of intent on the passport by representatives from Australia, Korea, New Zealand and Singapore in September 2013, committing to jointly issuing such a paper.

Interested parties are invited to make a submission on the consultation paper via the relevant economy:

  • Australia
  • Korea
  • New Zealand
  • Thailand
  • Singapore
  • The Philippines

Submissions will be published on this website unless a submitter specifically requests that the whole or part of the submission is treated as confidential.

Consultation closes on 11 July 2014.

Following this consultation, economies which decide to be passport member economies will work to finalise the arrangements by early 2015 with a view to the passport commencing in 2016.

16 April 2014

Mauritius: FSC Public Notice - Suspension of Management Licence of Apostle International Management Services Limited

Notice is hereby given that in accordance with Section 27 (7) of the Financial Services Act 2007 (the “FSA”), the Management Licence of Apostle International Management Services Limited has been suspended with immediate effect.

In accordance with Section 27(5) of the FSA, Apostle International Management Services Limited shall cease to carry out the activity authorized under its licence but shall remain subject to the obligations of a licensee and to the directions of the Commission until the suspension of the licence is cancelled.

Financial Services Commission
15 April 2014

14 April 2014

The capacity conundrum

The question of capacity continues to be one for debate and it has become increasingly apparent that it is not solved simply by the provision of an arbitrary headline number or cap. Geoff Ruddick takes a look at the key things to consider when assessing the capacity of an independent director.

04 April 2014

SOMO - Mailbox companies and human rights: the Dutch state duty to protect

SOMO researchers Roos van Os and Indra Römgens published an article in 'de Volkskrant' (Dutch newspaper) about the question: Why does the Netherlands make it possible for dubious mining companies, tax dodgers, dictators and arms dealers to hide their identity?

03 April 2014

States of Jersey launches financial services policy framework

The Government of Jersey has today published the policy framework that will shape the direction of Jersey’s financial services industry.

The document sets out the underlying principles for the government’s support of Jersey’s main industry, and outlines the policies that are deemed vital to its future.

The policy framework has been based on four key priorities that were set out in last year’s independent jurisdictional review of Jersey’s financial services industry:
  1. Sustain the core (protect existing business from the threat of competitive challenges)
  2. Enhance enablers (excel in the areas that determine investors’ choice of location: the legal, regulatory and business environments)
  3. Capture adjacent growth (attract business from the products, markets and services that are closest to our current positions)
  4. Reposition and build new capabilities (explore more ambitious opportunities in less familiar business territory, repositioning our current offering and building new capabilities)

The Chief Minister, Senator Ian Gorst, the Assistant Chief Minister and Treasury and Resources Minister, Senator Philip Ozouf, and the Director of Financial Services, Joe Moynihan, presented the document to Jersey Finance Limited, the JFSC and industry representatives at a launch event today.

Treasury and Resources Minister, Senator Philip Ozouf said: “The financial services industry is vitally important to the Island and is key to our economic health. This is the first time that government has made a clear, joined-up and confident commitment to secure and enhance our position as one of the world’s leading finance centres. The framework set out in this document and the strategies that flow from it will allow us to build on our strengths and ensure that Jersey maintains an important role in the global economy of the future.

“We have also made it clear that government remains committed to maintaining strong standards of regulation, cooperation and transparency. Our reputation as a high-quality jurisdiction is an important part of Jersey’s attraction to new and existing business.”

Jersey Finance Limited CEO, Geoff Cook, added: “I am very pleased that the government has offered its full support to the financial services industry. Last year, Jersey Finance conducted an independent jurisdictional review of the industry and outlined a number of key priorities to secure our future. This policy framework outlines a clear direction from government, commends the industry’s achievements to date and highlights the potential for a bright future, all of which are very welcome.”

02 April 2014

Jersey Finance appoints new Deputy Chief Executive

Richard, who joined Jersey Finance at the start of 2013, will continue to lead the organisation’s market development effort. In his earlier banking career he held senior roles with both The Royal Bank of Scotland International and Barclays Wealth, working in a number of leading finance centres. Before moving to Jersey Finance, Richard was Director for Barclays Wealth in Jersey.

Commenting on the appointment Geoff Cook, CEO of Jersey Finance, said: "I am delighted that we have been able to fill this senior role from within the organisation. Richard’s financial services background, his management skills and his more recent experience and insights in developing business in the key international markets, makes him ideally suited for the deputy chief executive role."

Richard Corrigan added: "I’m looking forward to the opportunity and challenge that the role brings in deputising for Geoff on occasions and supporting his work in representing the Industry where it is important that we have a voice, while continuing to oversee our international market development programme."

He replaces Heather Bestwick who left Jersey Finance in December.

01 April 2014

ACCA: Falling corporate income tax revenues not down to aggressive tax planning, says new research

An academic report from RMIT University School of Economics, Finance and Marketing provides extensive evidence that the corporate income tax system is not ‘broken’ and that it is not being eroded. 

Commissioned by ACCA (the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants), the report Multinational corporations, stateless income and tax havens asserts that there is no evidence to support the belief that that UK or the US corporate income tax base is being worn away. 

The report also states that advanced economies face a fiscal challenge, which creates the environment for a ‘tax grab’.

Sinclair Davidson, author of the report and professor at the School of Economics, Finance and Marketing at RMIT, says: 'The argument is that the corporate income tax base is being eroded by aggressive tax planning by multinational corporations – yet the evidence to support this argument is lacking. It is one thing to point out that multinational corporations do not pay tax in some jurisdictions but that says nothing about the actual corporate income tax base. To the extent that corporate income tax revenues have fallen in recent years, this is more likely to be a result of poor economic conditions than aggressive tax planning.'

Chas Roy-Chowdhury, head of taxation at ACCA, comments: 'This paper may well show that the global corporate income tax system is not broken, but questions remain about the evasion/avoidance/aggressive tax planning debate. ACCA has always been clear - tax evasion is a criminal activity and ACCA believes companies should not, in principle, pursue aggressive tax avoidance. Multinationals need to be clear about the value they bring for the benefit of their shareholders and wider society, and to communicate to all stakeholders their underlying commitment to the building of a sustainable business. Companies must see the management of tax obligations as part of that process of creating long-term value.'

Sinclair Davidson concludes: 'My report ends by saying that multinational corporations add value to both their home economies and their host economies. Tax havens add value by allowing multinationals to reduce their tax liabilities while increasing their investments in high-tax economies. An increase in their tax burdens would reduce those levels of investment, leading to reduced employment opportunities, reduced consumption and reduced innovation.

'It is not clear that tampering with the tried and tested norms of corporate income tax to possibly generate more corporate income tax revenue while reducing the corporate income tax collected in foreign economies, and possibly reducing investment, employment and consumption at home, is good policy.'

IFC Review: Here Comes FATCA…What To Expect In 2014

With FATCA looming on the horizon, Scott Michel examines what 2014 holds for those caught in its web. 

IFC Review - Due Diligence: Digital Currency

With the usage of digital currencies gaining ever more traction, Burke Files ponders whether the rise of digital currencies such as Bitcoin could lead to the end of traditional brick and mortar banking.

IFC Review: The World Moves Towards Tax Transparency

As automatic exchange of information comes ever closer to becoming the norm, Monica Bhatia highlights the OECDs crucial role in the fight against tax evasion. 

IFC Review: Segregated Structures – An Offshore Innovation

While segregated structures have been common place in offshore jurisdictions, Alan Dickson highlights the growing use of Segregated Portfolio Companies in Asia to structure investments into China. 

IFC Review - Malta: Case Study - The Redomiciliation of a Company

With group treasury companies growing in popularity, Walter Cutajar examines the redomiciliation of a foreign company as a Maltese company and how they could benefit from Malta's extensive tax treaty network. 

IFC Review: Malta - An IFC Gaining Strong Growth Traction

With Malta making its mark on the global financial stage, Kenneth Farrugia highlights the reasons why the jurisdiction is considered such a 'stable ship'. 

IFC Review: Q&A with Maltese Minister for Finance Prof Edward Scicluna

Financial services now stand as one of the main pillars of the Maltese economy. IFC Media speaks with Minister for Finance Professor Edward Scicluna regarding the rapid development of Malta as an IFC.