27 January 2011

OECD: Peer Review Report of Mauritius - Combined Phase 1 + Phase 2

Peer Review Report of Mauritius

Phase 1: Legal and Regulatory Framework

Phase 2: Implementation of the Standards in Practice

The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes is the multilateral framework within which work in the area of tax transparency and exchange of information is carried out by over 90 jurisdictions which participate in the work of the Global Forum on an equal footing.

This combined report summarises the legal and regulatory framework and Implementation of the Standards in Practice for transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes in Mauritius.

The Global Forum is charged with in-depth monitoring and peer review of the implementation of the standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. These standards are primarily reflected in the 2002 OECD Model Agreement on Exchange of Information on Tax Matters and its commentary, and in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and its commentary as updated in 2004, which has been incorporated in the UN Model Tax Convention.

The standards provide for international exchange on request of foreseeably relevant information for the administration or enforcement of the domestic tax laws of a requesting party. Fishing expeditions are not authorised but all foreseeably relevant information must be provided, including bank information and information held by fiduciaries, regardless of the existence of a domestic tax interest or the application of a dual criminality standard.

All members of the Global Forum, as well as jurisdictions identified by the Global Forum as relevant to its work, are being reviewed. This process is undertaken in two phases. Phase 1 reviews assess the quality of a jurisdiction’s legal and regulatory framework for the exchange of information, while Phase 2 reviews look at the practical implementation of that framework. Some Global Forum members are undergoing combined – Phase 1 plus Phase 2 – reviews. The ultimate goal is to help jurisdictions to effectively implement the international standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes.

All review reports are published once approved by the Global Forum and they thus represent agreed Global Forum reports.


Table of contents

About the Global Forum

Executive Summary


Introduction
Introduction and methodology used for the combined peer review of Mauritius
Overview of Mauritius
Recent developments

Compliance with the Standards

A. Availability of Information
Overview
A.1. Ownership and identity information
A.2. Accounting records
A.3. Banking information


B. Access to Information
Overview
B.1. Competent Authority’s ability to obtain and provide information
B.2. Notification requirements and rights and safeguards


C. Exchanging Information
Overview
C.1. Exchange-of-information mechanisms
C.2. Exchange-of-information mechanisms with all relevant partners
C.3. Confidentiality
C.4. Rights and safeguards of taxpayers and third parties
C.5. Timeliness of responses to requests for information


Summary of Determinations and Factors Underlying Recommendations


Annex 1: Jurisdiction’s Response to the Review Report
Annex 2: List of all Exchange-of-Information Mechanisms in Force
Annex 3: List of all Laws, Regulations and Other Relevant Material

Annex 4: People Interviewed During On-Site Visit
Annex 5: Letter to Treaty Partners


Channel Islands appoint head for new Brussels office

The Guernsey and Jersey governments have announced that the current British Ambassador to Bulgaria, Steve Williams, will be heading up the Islands’ new joint office in Brussels.

Mr Williams will take on the role of Director of European Affairs at the Channel Islands’ Brussels Office on Monday 4 April 2011. He will be Guernsey and Jersey’s senior representative in Brussels, leading efforts to develop the Islands’ influence, while advising the respective governments on European and international matters.

Jersey’s Chief Minister, Senator Terry Le Sueur, said: “We are pleased to have someone of Mr Williams’ calibre and experience representing us in Brussels. I have every confidence that Mr Williams will use his considerable skills and experience to enable us to achieve this objective.”

Guernsey's Chief Minister, Lyndon Trott, said: "I am delighted with the appointment of our new Director. His experience and track record are of an extremely high calibre and I am looking forward to working with him. He will play a vital role in the way that Guernsey and the Channel Islands engage with their partners in Brussels and across the European Union over the coming years."

Mr Williams has worked for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office for nearly 30 years, with postings including Oslo, Buenos Aires, Sofia and the UK Permanent Representation to the EU in Brussels. During this time, he has gained extensive experience of working with the EU and its institutions to deliver UK policy objectives in Europe.

Mr Williams said: "I am delighted and honoured to have been appointed to head the new Channel Islands’ Brussels Office. I am greatly looking forward to taking up my position, working with and for the governments, business communities and people of Guernsey and Jersey to promote Channel Islands’ interests in Europe."

The appointment of a Deputy Director to assist Mr Williams in his new role will be announced in due course.

World Economy: Getting it right in 2011

Angel GurrĂ­a, Secretary-General of the OECD


What is the state of world economy as we enter 2011? Have we made progress over the past 12 to 18 months in putting an end to the worst economic crisis in our lifetimes and laying the foundations for a stronger, cleaner and fairer world?


The scorecard is mixed. We have made good headway in ending the crisis, thanks to co-ordinated international efforts over the past two years, and a recovery is on the way. This is welcome news, since growth is badly needed to help governments deal with massive fiscal pressures, create jobs and address other major challenges. But we are not out of the woods yet. The recovery has been slower than we had hoped. Government finances have deteriorated sharply across the advanced economies in the OECD area, with public and private debt stretched to extremes in several countries. The aggregate budget deficit for the OECD was around 7.5% in 2010, while public debt as a share of GDP could be some 30% higher in 2011 than it was in 2007.


Unemployment remains intolerably high, averaging 8.5%, and has reached into double digits in some countries. People are worried about their jobs and their living standards. Ongoing difficulties in banking, the prospect of austerity and still weak housing markets are weighing down on the recovery.

In contrast to advanced economies, emerging markets are forging ahead. China’s output is projected to average just short of 10% in 2011-12, thanks to strong domestic demand. India’s growth should regain its trend of around 8.5% from mid-year, while Brazil, Indonesia and South Africa will also continue strong. In the OECD areas, some emerging economies, such as Mexico, Turkey and Poland, are also contributing with higher rates of growth.

But emerging markets also face policy challenges of their own. For instance, inflationary pressures are appearing in Brazil and China, while India has to tackle its fiscal deficit. There is also a growing need for these countries to focus more spending on social goals, and on advancing the structural reform agenda.

Poorer developing countries face a more difficult time, particularly in Africa where growth rates have slowed sharply, to around 2.5% in 2009, bringing GDP per head to a standstill. Though activity picked up in 2010, the situation does not augur well for meeting the Millennium Development Goals for 2015, with nearly a billion people still at risk of being trapped in poverty in five years time.

Slower growth than envisaged in the international trade arena has not helped, adding to global nervousness in currency markets and threats of protectionism.

Addressing these issues will remain a priority in 2011. Policy approaches required in most developed countries clearly differ from those needed in emerging markets. However, because the economic effects of these policies can be global, they must be co-ordinated through multilateral co-operation. This need has increased the prominence of the G20, which brings major developed and emerging markets around the table with the support of other countries and international organisations, including the OECD.

Meanwhile, we have stepped up our co-operation efforts to address other urgent matters too; at the UN Climate Change Conference in CancĂșn in December, for instance, all major players reaffirmed their commitment to tackling greenhouse gas emissions and we are addressing issues of mitigation, adaptation, financing and technology transfer.

So, while the overall economic scorecard for 2010 was disappointing, we nonetheless enter 2011 on a positive footing. Everyone realises that this recovery, fragile as it is, must be nurtured and strengthened if we are to build the bright future we all want. In short, we must get it right in 2011.

This inaugural OECD Yearbook, which marks our organisation’s 50th anniversary, comes at just the right time. With contributions by world leaders, and top representatives from business, labour and civil society, as well as OECD experts, it is full of valuable insights into the issues we confront and explains the role our organisation is playing in helping to resolve them.

Promoting a sustainable recovery, fostering new sources of growth

The challenges that different countries face vary, depending on their level of development. However, the structural reform agenda–to enhance the productive capacity of our economies–is a unifying link in current policy discussions. At the G20 summits, I have emphasised this point, given the limited room for manoeuvre on the fiscal and monetary fronts. Structural reforms help by dealing with fiscal and international balancing issues, while fostering new sources of growth, and are part and parcel of the G20’s most innovative initiative: the Framework for Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth.

As a guiding light in this structural agenda, innovation is key to solving many economic problems. The OECD Innovation Strategy, launched in 2010, provides a set of policy recommendations to integrate this concept into the growth plans of OECD and partner countries. We see innovation in its broad sense, starting with R&D, but going well beyond it. Innovation calls for intelligent competition policies; investment in human resources, including in higher education and its links with businesses; better regulatory environments for firms; and the fostering of an entrepreneurial spirit.

Not surprisingly, innovation is a key pillar in our Green Growth Strategy, which we will be presenting to our 50th anniversary Ministerial Council Meeting in May 2011. The issue is not just about greening old activities or making them cleaner, but about harnessing knowledge and new technologies to create jobs and wealth in a sustainable manner. It requires overcoming barriers to green growth, including eliminating environmentally harmful subsidies, and reviewing the structure of taxation systems and trade barriers. It also requires implementing regulatory frameworks to foster a shift away from inefficient and polluting consumption and production patterns.

Our message that “green” and “growth” go well together was delivered clearly at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP 16) in Mexico in December 2010, where important breakthroughs on agreements were achieved. This helped re-inject confidence into both the international climate change negotiations and the multilateral process overall. In 2011, the OECD will continue to build on such progress towards the next Climate Change Conference (COP 17), in Durban, South Africa.

In the quest to rebuild the international economy and put it on a sounder basis, we should also address the growing gap between how conventional macro-economic statistics such as GDP are read, and how people perceive their own economic situations. A broader range of indicators must be used alongside standard economic measurements to better capture peoples’ well-being and quality of life. At the OECD we are working to develop such measurements, as well as to distil the policy implications of this broader approach.

Jobs, skills and knowledge: Catalysts for a new economy

High unemployment has been the tragic human face of this crisis, and only when we bring unemployment down will we be able to declare the crisis over. Keeping vulnerable people attached to the job market, including the long-term unemployed, is essential.

A key requirement is to boost skills. This applies particularly to young people, who are more than twice as likely to be unemployed than the average worker. Since the crisis started, 3.5 million young people have joined the ranks of the unemployed in the OECD area, while still more have left the workforce altogether. This is a waste of resources which no country can afford. We must do more to avoid a lost generation and to tap into the potential and creativity that the young generation has to offer.

The post-crisis world will likely evidence the need for new skills. Workers will need to continue upgrading their skills to increase their chances of employability. We already observe an important change in policy focus from “life-long employment” to “life-long employability”. To make this happen, lifelong learning will be one of the most important features in the successful economies and societies of the future. Improving jobs and skills, regardless of gender, age or background, must go hand in hand, and the OECD is developing a skills strategy to show how this can be achieved.

Empowering women

As we look for new sources of growth, we must not forget that in many countries, women’s participation in the labour market lags below potential.
The crisis has made it clear that failing to realise the full potential of women carries huge economic and social costs. Yet enabling women fully to participate in the labour market and contribute to economic development promotes prosperity and stability, reduces child poverty, helps address the pressures of population ageing, and increases productivity. The OECD will be assessing the best policy practices needed to promote gender equality and take fuller advantage of women’s potential.

Advancing global development

Development is a central priority for action in 2011. It has always been at the heart of the OECD’s mission, and indeed was a central motive for creating the organisation in the first place. In half a century of development assistance, there are many success stories to tell, with millions being lifted out of poverty, and the rise of emerging markets being prime examples. The developing world now accounts for over a fifth of total trade and is an integral part of the world economy. This is to be celebrated as it is what the OECD has worked towards since its creation.

In 2011 we must work harder to lift people out of poverty. The OECD is stepping up its co-operation with developing countries, by going beyond aid to assist with institutional and capacity building in areas such as taxation. We are promoting “whole-of-government” approaches that embrace innovation and green growth, which can help reduce food and water scarcity problems, and improve healthcare. The aim is to build resilience. Developing countries must be able to play a fuller role in building a better world, and, as our convention says, it is our duty to help them do so.

The role of emerging markets is critical in this regard, and this gives extra relevance to the G20. We must all work together to solve trade and currency tensions, conclude the Doha round of trade talks and restore balance to the global economy.

Addressing such problems is the bread and butter of our organisation. It can only be done through co-operation. Indeed, if “co-operation” is part of our title, it is largely because our founders were convinced it was vital for the “peaceful and harmonious relations among the peoples of the world”.

Restoring trust in public and private institutions

No fundamental reform will work without taking action in 2011 to strengthen the governance of our economies. For people who had been used to years of continuous growth, the crisis came as a shock, undermining not only the institutions themselves, but the public’s faith in them. The crisis uncovered serious failures in governance and regulation. Livelihoods collapsed, and people are demanding better management of their economies. Failure to restore trust could fuel an even more serious crisis in the future.

The OECD has been leading the charge, with our Anti-Bribery Convention which criminalises bribery of foreign officials for business contracts, with our 2010 guidelines to make lobbying more transparent and ethical, and via our corporate governance principles. Additionally, our Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises are currently being strengthened. Members and partner countries alike have endorsed these powerful instruments, but should do far more to use them in their efforts to restore confidence in 2011.

One area where action is needed is in our financial markets, to deepen reforms which improve bank resilience and reduce the exposure of our economic systems to excessive risk-taking. The international community has spent trillions of dollars rescuing the financial system, but the sector is still not back to full health.

One thing we have learned is that bank bailouts and guarantees are not enough. We must fix a system where losses made by greedy investors during boom times are passed on to ordinary taxpayers during bad times. This is not only an unfair way to share the risks, it is also a market distortion that increases the likelihood of another bank-led crisis in the future.

Shifting wealth, the G20 and the OECD

The crisis also emphasised an emerging trend that the OECD has characterised as “shifting wealth”. This trend means that countries like China and India are increasing their economic power and their say in the global economy. By the first quarter of 2010, developing countries held approximately two-thirds of global currency reserves, up from only a third a decade earlier. By 2030, we estimate that emerging economies will account for nearly 60% of world GDP. In the developing world, this shift in wealth has brought substantial improvements in growth and poverty reduction. The number of people in the world living on less than a dollar a day has fallen by more than a quarter– approximately half a billion–since 1990. About 90% of these people were in China.

But the challenges associated with this rapid change in global economics are significant: how can we ensure global financial stability? How can we deal with climate change? How can we manage natural resources in a sustainable way, while protecting everyone’s right to a decent way of life?

The emergence of the G20 as the premier forum for economic discussions and action is probably the greatest transformation in global governance since 1945. Indeed, the G20 facilitated a quick response to the immediate, short-term challenges posed by the financial crisis. But it is also gradually providing a forum for promoting a multilateral approach to structural issues, ranging from taxation and combating corruption, to the promotion of trade and investment.

How can an organisation like the OECD help foster global governance and promote multilateral co-operation in this rapidly changing world? Here, I must quote former Chilean President Michelle Bachelet, who once described the OECD not as “the club of rich countries”, as many people wrongly characterise us, but as a “club of best practices”.

Since its inception, G20 leaders have called on the OECD for our contributions on a wide range of issues. These include substantive analytical work and policy advice on fossil fuel subsidies, on employment and social policies, on investment and trade, on bribery and corruption, on taxation and on the Framework for Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth, particularly the structural aspects. Thanks to several decades of experience on development issues, we are also actively contributing in the creation of the G20’s new Development Action Plan.

Yet, while the scope of the OECD’s work is vast and unique, maximising our effectiveness and relevance means that we must also become more global. In 2010 Chile, Estonia, Israel and Slovenia became members of the OECD and accession talks with Russia are advancing. We are designing innovative arrangements to engage with non-member countries, particularly through our Enhanced Engagement programme with Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. Some 100 non-member countries participate regularly as equals in the work of our committees, expert meetings and forums. We also work closely with business, trade unions, foundations and not-for-profit organisations.

Expectations are high, and we look forward to working with the French presidency of the G20 in 2011 to get the job done in these and many other areas.

Using our past to build a better future

Our organisation has played an important role in forging this better world, by setting standards and acting as a pathfinder for better practices. We will continue to work alongside members and partners to help them meet those standards, and to steer a course through current difficulties. As well as providing facts and insights, our advice will assist them in the tricky task of making reform happen.

The world economy has made giant strides in 50 years. But it is a more complex world and the challenges before us are as serious as any we have faced in the past. Yet, the goals our founders set for this organisation remain true today. Indeed, the OECD Convention, which was signed on 14 December 1960, could have been written precisely with today’s challenges in mind, and in particular with our main objective of promoting “better policies for better lives”.

Guernsey’s transparency and exchange of information commitment endorsed by independent international forum

In a report published today, the Global Forum on Transparency & Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes (‘the Global Forum’) confirms that Guernsey has not only followed through its 2002 commitment to observe the OECD principles on transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes but has made substantive developments in expanding its exchange of information network.

The report also confirms that Guernsey has in place all the necessary legal and regulatory powers to ensure it can meet the internationally agreed standard on obtaining and exchanging information for tax purposes.

Guernsey’s Chief Minister, Lyndon Trott, said: “I am delighted that, hard on the heels of a very favourable report from the IMF, Guernsey has received this endorsement of its legal and regulatory framework from an international body such as the Global Forum. The report confirms Guernsey’s long standing commitment to meeting international standards. It is another independent endorsement that Guernsey is a well regulated, transparent and co-operative member of the international community.

“Guernsey committed to the OECD’s principles of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes in 2002, and this report clearly demonstrates that that undertaking was no hollow exercise. The fact that this report was prepared by our peers in the Global Forum, and has measured Guernsey’s system as being equal to some of the largest and most important countries on the planet, acknowledges Guernsey’s place in the premier league of financial centres committed to international standards of probity.”

The report says: “Guernsey has made substantive developments in expanding its [exchange of information] network, predominantly since 2006, and this has been combined with the development of a complementary domestic process to manage requests received from its [exchange of information] partners.”

The Global Forum has been the driving force behind the development and acceptance of international standards on transparency and effective exchange of information for tax purposes. It was created in 2000 and currently consists of 97 member jurisdictions. Guernsey is a full member of the Global Forum. In 2009, the Global Forum produced an ambitious four and a half year Peer Review process, the intention of which is to establish a robust and comprehensive process to monitor and review progress made by jurisdictions towards full and effective exchange of information up to the international standards.

Guernsey is scheduled to undergo a Phase 2 review in 2012 where the review team will look at the practical implementation of the exchange of information process. This will involve the Assessment Team visiting Guernsey and evaluating the effectiveness of how the Income Tax Office obtains information and exchanges it with our Tax Information Exchange Agreement (TIEA) partners.

Guernsey’s Chief Minister added: “I look forward to the Phase 2 Review where I am confident that Guernsey will be given yet another opportunity to demonstrate its strong commitment to meeting its international obligations.”

26 January 2011

Review of Island Economic Development Strategies

The report raises the following questions - how are island communities coping with the effects of the recent global economic and financial turmoil? What are island governments doing to sustain and/or develop their economies? In seeking answers to these questions, twenty island government economic development strategies/plans are reviewed.

A variety of islands were selected based on economic characteristics, size of population and size of landmass providing a spread of economies which included Bermuda, Singapore, Prince Edward Island, Jersey, Isle of Man, Tasmania and the Cayman Islands.

A review of each of the twenty islands economic development strategies and plans was undertaken together profiling and identifying government funding and target sectors for support.

Development strategies and plans for three islands are used as case studies providing a more in-depth insight into how these island authorities are seeking to enhance their economies. The research has sought to identify innovative ways of sustaining economic activity and what Governments and stakeholders are doing to improve market share in certain sectors. As a result of the global economic and financial crisis some Governments have shifted their focus geographically either at a global level, ‘tapping into’ world markets or at a more localised/regional level.

FT: India and Globalisation

• India is watching for signs of protectionism among its partners

• Ascent to double-digit economic growth is new territory, and powerful middlemen shut foreign groups out of the shops

Strong growth yet to improve lives of the poor

World leaders are keen to recognise the success of a rising power. For most Indians, however, the picture is not so rosy, says James Lamont

Outsourcing: Thick skins shrug off protectionist rhetoric

James Lamont on the industry’s role in creating US jobs

The economy: High plaudits tempered by inflation fears

Strong growth is welcome, but rising food prices are causing concern, writes James Lamont

Retail: Dramatic food price rises may help open doors to foreigners

Amy Kazmin on the politically sensitive issue of obtaining investment

Guest column: A healthy financial system is essential for progress

Finance holds the key to achieving India’s long-term growth potential, writes Eswar Prasad

Nuclear industry: Government bowls sector a surprise googly

Amy Kazmin reports on controversial legislation that threatens to get in the way of plans to address a huge electricity deficit

The auto industry: Tamil Nadu on the road to attracting more investment

Carmakers are encouraged by the way the state government delivers on its promises, writes James Fontanella-Khan

Textiles: New destinations save once ‘doomed’ sector

James Fontanella-Khan reports on a revival in prospects for an industry that employs 50m people

Financing: Global reach provides new avenues for raising cash

James Fontanella-Khan reports on the savings to be made by seeking funds abroad

Pharmaceuticals: Rich pickings at home and abroad

Global companies are not so sniffy about cheap drugs these days, writes Amy Kazmin


Adobe PDF icon

Guernsey Funds Focus Feature In Corporate INTL

The January 2011 edition of Corporate INTL. includes a feature looking at how Guernsey's finance industry can provide products and services to the Indian Market.

Content includes:

  • How Guernsey is well placed to provide financial services
  • Investors focus on the expanding Indian economy
  • Multi-jurisdictional funds, corporate and trust structures

You can read the articles from Peter Niven (Guernsey Finance), Tom Carey (Carey Olsen) and Stuart Platt-Ransom (Legis Group) by clicking on the PDF link below.

Guernsey Fund industry.pdf Guernsey Fund industry.pdf[395.05 KB]

UK: FSA levies £1.12m fine on Barclays Capital for client money breaches

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Barclays Capital Securities Ltd (Barclays Capital) £1.12 million for failing to protect and segregate on an intra-day basis client money held in sterling money market deposits.

Under the FSA’s client money rules, firms are required to keep client money separate from the firm's money in segregated accounts with trust status. This helps to safeguard and ring-fence the client money in the event of the firm's insolvency.

For over eight years, between 1 December 2001 and 29 December 2009, Barclays Capital failed to segregate client money maturing from its sterling money market deposits on an intra-day basis. Such client monies were segregated overnight but matured into a proprietary bank account and were mixed on a daily basis with Barclays Capital’s own funds, typically for between five and seven hours within each trading day.

The average daily amount of client money which was not segregated increased from £6 million in 2002 to £387 million in 2009. The highest amount held in the account and at risk at any one time was £752 million. Had the firm become insolvent within the five to seven hours each day in which the funds were unsegregated, this client money would have been at risk of loss.

Margaret Cole, managing director of enforcement and financial crime, said:

"Barclays Capital committed a serious breach of FSA client money rules by failing to segregate millions of pounds of its clients’ money for over eight years. This posed a significant risk and the penalty reflects the amount of client money involved in this breach.

"The FSA has repeatedly emphasised the importance of ensuring that client money is adequately protected and in the past year has taken enforcement action against firms of all sizes for breaches of its client money rules.

"Adhering to these rules not only ensures greater protection of clients but of financial stability as a whole. The FSA’s specialist client assets unit will continue to intensify its focus in this area."

In working out the level of the penalty the FSA took into account that the misconduct was not deliberate and that Barclays Capital rectified the situation on discovery. No clients of Barclays Capital suffered any losses as a consequence of the segregation error. Barclays Capital did not profit from, or avoid losses as a result of the breach, nor was there any incorrect financial reporting by Barclays Capital in the period December 2001 to December 2009.

The firm co-operated with the FSA in the course of its investigation and agreed to settle at an early stage. In doing so it qualified for a 30% discount. Without the settlement discount the fine would have been £1.61 million.

The Final Notice for Barclays Capital is available on the FSA website.

Central Asia: More diversified and competitive economies would attract investors

Economic diversification and increased competitiveness could make Central Asia a new frontier of economic opportunity for global investors, says a new OECD report to be presented tomorrow at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

The OECD Central Asia Competitiveness Outlook recommends that governments of the region implement structural reforms to tackle three key barriers to competitiveness: a mismatch between worker skills and job market needs, limited access to finance for smaller businesses and an over-reliance on the energy sector.

Launching the report at the World Economic Forum, OECD Secretary-General Angel GurrĂ­a will highlight the opportunities for Central Asian economies and global investors. “Countries in Central Asia have a great potential. But they need to be able to leverage their comparative advantages, including their geographic location, their abundance of natural resources and a hard-working and young labour force.The combination of structural reforms, innovative policies and social programmes will allow them to reach their full potential.”

"Austrian companies are increasingly investing in this important region," said Austrian Chancellor Werner Faymann. "But I have to emphasize that a further increase of investment depends also on Central Asian policy makers, who need to accelerate their reform efforts in the area of rule of law as well as by fighting corruption. Moreover, fair distribution of incomes in the region will also support the development of stable societies.”

Vast energy reserves, mineral and agricultural resources and almost universal literacy rates spurred Central Asia’s strong economic performance over the decade prior to the crisis: foreign direct investment increased ninefold; gross domestic product grew at a rate of 8% per year and labour productivity grew nearly 5% faster than world average.

However, overdependency on natural resources – with as much as two-thirds of foreign direct investment to the region going to the energy sector - has left Central Asian economies highly exposed to the uncertainties of international markets. The global crisis has temporarily slowed growth levels in the region, further inderlining the need to improve competitiveness.

Central Asian policy makers must work more closely with the private sector, focusing on:

  • developing education strategies that reflect the labour market’s needs and strike the right balance between tertiary education and vocational training;
  • making small and medium-sized enterprise financing a priority by further reforming the financial sector and developing guarantee schemes; and
  • improving the region’s investment policy and promotion frameworks by implementing a second generation of reforms in land ownership regulations and pro-actively promoting non-energy sectors to investors.


Central Asia labour productivity growth relative to the world, 1993-2008


Note: Central Asia does not include Afghanistan; GDP per employee is calculated as GDP in constant 2000 USD divided by the total people employed over 15 years old
Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators / OECD analysis


More than ten heads of state and government, including the Presidents of Switzerland, Azerbaijan and Ukraine, the Prime Minister of Kazakhstan and the Chancellor of Austria, and numerous business leaders will participate in Davos for the launch of this first Competitiveness Outlook for the region.

The new report on Central Asia is the first Competitiveness Outlook prepared under the aegis of the wider OECD Eurasia Competitiveness Programme which includes seven countries from Central Asia(Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan) and six countries from Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine).

A second Competitiveness Outlook on Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus will follow in June 2011.